🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam ruling, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that may create as many as five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to set aside a federal judge's ruling that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and upsetting the fine balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its decision.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably grouped voters according to their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to revert to the boundaries created after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Strong Opposition

Through a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, observing that its opinion was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its increased favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

The ruling occurs during a countrywide fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican majority. Typically, redistricting takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that are estimated to yield several more conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

Conversely, Democratic officials lamented the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

Another top House leader argued the court had another time eroded its standing by rubber-stamping a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.